User:Jenila Tamang/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating the Cultural Anthropology article and I have wiki linked the article below.

Cultural anthropology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am interested to know about the diverse culture and cultural evolutionism. I have been connecting every incident Anthropologically and studying the depth of Anthropology.

Evaluate the article
Lead

The lead is very instructional. It explains a precise outline of cultural anthropology encompassing to develop and publish the ideology of cultural anthropology.

Content

This article overlooks the contributions and arguments by the anthropologists than tracing the detailed information on the concept of culture.

Tone and balance

I think the tone and balance are neutral. For instance, it criticizes and supports participant observation as it has been efficacy to interpret the obscured information and on the other hand, the observant might be influenced by their own perspective in interpreting the information. I sense no imparity with that because it depicts both sides.

Sources and references

Ref 2 is from the Annual Review of Anthropology, which is an authoritative source of journalism for a general audience, especially for librarians, agents, and authors.

Ref 3 is from Primitive book and I am unsure whether this book is a good source or not.

The sources are arranged correctly.

Organization and writing quality

I think the writing organization and quality are satisfactory. The organization is fine because it initiates by describing the origination and contribution to the sub-topics of the cultural anthropology

Image and media

There are six images. The image of Portale of Leonardo da Vinci image is not in the public domain and requires special permission to use whereas the image of Franz Boas, Margaret Mead, and Ruth Benedict is in the public domain and has no copyright restriction. The image of Edward Burnett Tylor and a comparison of the cultural evolution are permitted to use under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

Talk page discussion

Since people are highly influenced by the automation of technologies and science so there is only one discussion on the talk page. It has been rated as C-class on the quality scale and Top-importance on the importance scale. It is within the scope of the Wiki project Culture and WikiProject Anthropology.

Overall impressions

In my point of view, this article is informative and intriguing. It would have been even more interesting if it includes the sub-area or fields of the article. The article should have been majorly focused on its topic itself and its contribution more than its subtopic.