User:JeniyaB/Baked Ziti

1. What stub did you choose? Why did you choose this one? Copy and past the URL link into your Sandbox

Baked ziti I chose this one because I was surprised that baked ziti didn't have as much information on the page because it's a popular dish.

2. How do you know that it's a stub: Identify where on the page that you know that this is a stub

I got this from the stubs category that was provided by my instructor and also the references are only 3 and the information that was provided was very slim.

3. What are some missing or under-developed parts of this stub? A good way to determine this is to compare your stub to a more developed article on the same topic and category. So for example, if you chose a stub-article on a horror novel, look for another Wikipedia article on another horror novel that is more fully developed. What is missing on your stub page in comparison? You should devote 4-5 sentences to answering this question.

Compared to this stub Lasagna the baked ziti stub is missing the origins and history aspect of information to be provided,it doesn't have a gallery of pictures really to see what it looks like, and also another thing I pointed out was that it doesn't give us a list of other meals or other ideas you can do with the pasta.

4. In particular, locate the "References" section of the stub. What, if anything, is listed in the references? If the references are hyperlinked, do the links still work?

For instance they have newspapers linked to where the information came from and also they have a recipe linked to how they make baked ziti.

5. And, when you compare this stub to a well developed article of the same category type, what sections of the overall article are present, and what are missing?

The main thing that is there is the description of what baked ziti is and the origins as i stated above are missing from the article so overall more information could be in this stub.

From Dr. Hildebrandt: Jeniya, nice job with this. It looks like you could actually make some good contributions to an article like this--I'm also surprised it doesn't have more development! Just think about what type of source you might use to improve this article. Btw, I didn't see your work for SA #24 in Wikipedia. Did you have any problems with that?