User:JennaMacG/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Combahee River Collective

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because the Combahee River Collective was an extremely important group within the history of feminism. My preliminary impression of the article was good as I thought it was detailed and descriptive.

Evaluate the article
The lead sections are concise and strong as they provide brief overviews of the article's content.

The content is relevant and up-to-date. Multiple components within the article are covered substantially. This article specifically showcases historically underrepresented topics since the Combahee River Collective was a Black lesbian feminist organization.

The article contains some biased claims (near the end), but for the most part, its content is neutral.

The facts within the article are backed by multiple reliable sources (archives, documentaries, reviews, etc). The sources cover a range of years, ranging from mature to very current. For the couple of cited links I pressed on, they worked.

The article is well-organized and break down the major points the Combahee River Collective. From what I have read, there are no evident spelling errors.

The article does not contain any images of the Combahee River Collective or its individual members (just images of what Wikipedia series the article belongs to). I think that adding appropriate images would enhance the article's content and allow readers to familiarize themselves with visual representations of the Combahee River Collective.

The conversations on the Talk Page discuss which ways the article can be improved. Specifically, the Talk Page addresses topics such as merging other Wikipedia pages to the Combahee River Collective and the organization's connection to LQBTQ+ history. The article is a part of many WikiProjects, and its rating within the projects range from low-importance to high-importance.

The article is very informative and covers the Combahee River Collective in depth. To improve the article, I would recommend adding images of the organization and removing some of the biased content. Overall, I believe the article is well-developed as it contains various components that are extremely detailed.