User:Jennifer0327/Cognitive Estrangement in Latinx Speculative Fiction/SylKL Peer Review

Peer review
Here is Sylvia's review of Jennifer's article.

General info

 * I am reviewing Jennifer's (Jennifer0327) work.
 * Link: User:Jennifer0327/Cognitive Estrangement in Latinx Speculative Fiction

Lead
Your article does a great job of providing an overview of what exactly cognitive estrangement is, and what it means within the context of Latinx speculative fiction specifically. Because you created this page from scratch, I can see why it doesn't have a specific lead, but I think it could be helpful for your own writing to break the text up into chunks. Your first three sentences seem to embody what a lead should be: they describe what the term is, and how Latinx writers use it. It is very clear and concise, and I really like it as is. The rest of your article could be broken up into chunks, which I will talk more about in the organization section.

Content
I honestly don't think you need to change your content. Your have described the topic well and in both broad and specific terms. It is the perfect introduction to the concept, which is exactly what Wikipedia is supposed to be.

Tone and Balance
I think you do a good job of maintaining a neutral tone when you describe this literary tool. You do not make an argument about it being specifically good or bad, you just describe what it is and how it is used. There are a few points where you describe the tool in political terms, or describe how it impacts readers, and I'm assuming this is coming from your research. These opinions are great to keep in the article as it provides context about what academics have been saying, but it would be nice to see citations so that readers know where else to look if they want to read more discourse on the topic.

Sources and References
I can tell that you've done a lot of good research for this article! You reference prominent individuals in the field of Latinx literature, and specific stories like The Hungry Woman. I am assuming from a lot of your content that you have also pulled information from other articles about the political implications of this writing tool and a unique concept in academic writing, but I wish I could see some of your sources so I could read more. I think you should include a bibliography so people can see where you got this information, and add in-text citations so readers can see where each argument made about cognitive estrangement is coming from.

Organization
The organization of your article is great. It gets more specific as you keep reading, which is really helpful for understanding both a broad concept and its specific applications. Your writing is clear and free of errors. My only suggestion is that you break the piece up into sections. After the first three sentences which I see as your Lead, you could have one on cognitive estrangement as a political tool, one on cognitive estrangment in writing, and one on the specific example of The Hungry Woman. For these sections, you can keep your paragraphs as they are, as they are well written, but could just be separated out more clearly for the readers.

Images and Media
Your piece does not currently have any images, and I think that is fine. While it could be helpful for readers to have a visual representation of the concept to solidify their understanding, because this is a fairly broad literary topic, I am unsure of how well it would translate into an image. If you want to add one I say go ahead, but no pressure!

Overall impressions
Overall, this article does an amazing job of explaining a complex topic in simple terms so that everyone can understand it, regardless of how familiar with it they might be. My main suggestion is to break the article up into sections and to add a bibliography so that readers can know where to find more information.