User:JenniferZargote/User:JenniferZargote/sandbox/Kiara2005 Peer Review

General info
Jennifer
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:JenniferZargote/sandbox - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):


 * Her lead isn’t clear about her topic.
 * It doesn’t give a brief explanation of her topic.
 * Yes, it includes information that isn’t presented in the article.


 * Content
 * Yes, her information is relevant to what she is talking about.
 * The content is up to date.
 * I do think there is a lot of information that could be added here.


 * Tone & Balance
 * Yes, the content is neutral
 * No, the content is general information of what happened,
 * The Mexican American's side was the only point of view, maybe just add a little more of the other party's side.
 * Sources & References
 * Yes, the sources are all up to date; they are all in the 2000s.
 * Yes her content is backed up by reliable up to date sources.
 * All her sources are through i.e and reflect reliable literature.
 * These sources were written by diverse people.
 * Organization
 * The content is written ok.
 * The sections that it’s broken down into are fine, it's just the placement of the sections.
 * Overall
 * First thing I will say is it was an insightful piece of writing. I just wish it was more information. Also she needs to switch her first and second paragraph around because her second paragraph is more of the lead.