User:Jenniferortiz597/User:Qt dork/Sofía Córdova/Jenniferortiz597 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Qt Dork


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Qt dork/Sofía Córdova
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article has a straight forward introduction. It's clear who and what the article will be about, followed by the table of contents that will directly take you the different sections. Each section in the table of contents is straight forward as well. There's not much information about the artist themselves. In the biography, where describing the artist's style of work the sentence, "Considers sci-fi as alternative history, dance music's liberatory potential, the internet, colonial contamination,... etc," is a little hard to understand. I reread it a. couple of times to get a grip of what is being said. I understand it is a quote, but perhaps elaborate or break down what that means in a less complex way would create a better flow in the biography section. There are a lot of lists of artworks and what they participated in, the links attached to some of the exhibition pieces work. Also links in the references work as well. The overall article seems complete, besides the artwork section that is left blank. The large collection of work done by the artist that has been listed is well organized by date. Since, the article is just information, I see no bias or fixed viewpoint.