User:Jennymayo/sandbox

Article Evaluation
I evaluated an article on the Pilsen Wellness Center. I think the focus on the state audits and the Fox News investigation received more attention in the article. While I think it was definitely important to include both and without any biased language, the focus on these issues conveyed some negative bias. The article was written a few years ago and maybe the website wasn’t as well developed as it is now, but the article could have gone more in depth with the services offered by the wellness center. Centers like these are very important in Latinx communities as they may speak Spanish and also provide cheaper services for those who may not have insurance and so maybe the writer could’ve extended more on the good stuff about the center. Granted, I don’t know too much about the center besides what I read on the Wiki page, so maybe they really aren’t that great and maybe they still take advantage of a vulnerable community. I did click on all of the reference links and a couple didn’t work (asnchicago.org and the last article starting with “Workers say Pilsen…”) I noticed the article was last edited the same year it was created so it could definitely use some updates. As far as the Talk page, there were a few comments that questioned the sources as well as bias evident in the articles. The article is said to be within the “scope of WikiProject Chicago”, but it has yet to receive any ratings on quality and importance.