User:Jeongbean/Ullmann reaction/Primary resource Peer Review

General info
Jeongbean
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Jeongbean/Ullmann reaction
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ullmann reaction

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

There are no in text citations and only two total citations used in the drafted changes. It is unclear which paragraphs are consider the "Lead" and which are considered the body. I am assuming the first two paragraphs in the Sandbox are the Lead.

The lead is good, well written and provides interesting background information. I recommend adding into your sandbox any images that you are hoping to reference in your text. I'd also recommend adding a bit more summary about what the rest of the article will contain.

Content:

Your history section is very interesting, and relevant. You've definitely provided some interesting background and, later in the text, some selected mechanisms that exemplify the type of reactions that the Ullmann reaction covers.

A few suggestions to improve the article: Add some figures and reference them in the text - I think this will make some of the mechanistic text a little easier to understand, and you may find some of this text is then superfluous.

Remember in text citations in your final draft, and to have varied sources if you can.

The sources you have are good sources, though you will likely need more in the final draft.

The content is well organized and very well and clearly written.

You should also link to other wiki pages when you can to make the article more visible and provide easily accessed background information for interested readers.