User:Jep224/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Family purpose doctrine.


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic; it focuses solely on the family purpose doctrine. Further, it is written neutrally; there are no personal opinions in the article. However, not every claim is cited, and the citations are not sufficiently reliable; the article "relies excessively on references to primary sources" and it "needs additional citations for verification." The article does not address any of Wikipedia's equity gaps.


 * Sources

Gause v. Smithers, 403 S.C. 140 (June 5, 2013).

NC ST § 75A-10.1.

NCDAMAGE § 30:8.

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Eggshell skull.


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic; it focuses solely on the eggshell skull plaintiff doctrine. Further, it is written neutrally; there are no personal opinions in the article. However, not every claim is cited, and the citations are not sufficiently reliable. Some examples include: (1) "[t]he examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject," (2) "[t]his article needs additional citations for verification," and (3) "[t]his article relies excessively on references to primary sources." The article does not address any of Wikipedia's equity gaps.


 * Sources
 * Rockhill v. Danbury Hospital, 168 A.3d 630 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017).
 * Figueroa -Torres v. Toledo-Davila, 232 F.3d 270 (1st Cir. 2000).
 * Dahlen v. Gulf Crews, Inc., 281 F.3d 487 (5th Cir. 2002).
 * MS ST § 11-7-13.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Vicarious liability.


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic; it focuses solely on the vicarious liability doctrine in tort law. Further, it is written neutrally; there are no personal opinions in the article. However, not every claim is cited, and the citations are not sufficiently reliable; "[t]he examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject." The article does not address any of Wikipedia's equity gaps.


 * Sources
 * Dabasse v. Reyes, 963 So.2d 288 (Aug. 3, 2007).
 * Meyer v. Holley, 537 U.S. 280 (2023).
 * David L. Reed, Vicarious Liability under Doctrine of Ostensible or Apparent Agency, American Jurisprudence Proof of Facts 3d (Feb. 2023).

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Insurance bad faith.


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic; it focuses solely on the insurance bad faith doctrine. Further, it is written neutrally; there are no personal opinions in the article. However, not every claim is cited, and the citations are not sufficiently reliable; "[t]his article needs additional citations for verification." The article does not address any of Wikipedia's equity gaps.


 * Sources
 * Dombroski v. WellPoint, Inc., 895 N.E.2d 538 (Oh. 2008).
 * Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 784 N.W.2d 542 (Wis. 2010).
 * Mark L. Harrison and Samuel Langerman, Actions Against Insurer for Bad Faith Failure to Settle Claim, American Jurisprudence Trials (Feb. 2023).

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Breach of confidence.


 * Article Evaluation
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic; it focuses solely on the breach of confidence doctrine. Further, it is written neutrally; there are no personal opinions in the article. However, not every claim is cited, and the citations are not sufficiently reliable; "[t]his article needs additional citations for verification." The article does not address any of Wikipedia's equity gaps.


 * Sources
 * Burns v. Irving, 810 F.Supp.2d 1167 (D. Nev. 2011).
 * LA C.C. Art. 1954.
 * § 68:14. Nature of breach of confidence, California Civil Practice Business Litigation (Oct. 2022).