User:Jeremiah0815/Evaluate an Article


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic and there was nothing that distracted me.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * No information is out of date and there is not much missing.
 * What else could be improved?
 * I believe some of the accomplishments could be improved.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is neutral and there are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links work and the source support the claims in the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Each fact is referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference that comes from reputable article sources. These are neutral sources and thus, there is not bias noted.f
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are not much conversations going on behind the scenes on how to represent this topic.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This article is a a part of the WikiProjects.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Wikipedia discusses this topic as a biography of J.B. Jackson, which is similar to Diva Amon.
 * What is J.B. Jackson currently working on? ~