User:Jeriblank/New media art/Drpencil9 Peer Review

=Whose work are you reviewing?

Jeriblank

Link to draft you're reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jeriblank/New_media_art?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_media_art

Evaluate the drafted changes

 Lead 

The editor did not add any information to the lead section of this article. Will this be something that you will be contributing to in your draft?

 Content 

The editor has made significant contributions to the article by adding new headers with lots of information. The editor has made great efforts to add to the significance of the article.

Tone and Balance

The tone and balance of the article are neutral and give an unbiased description. It provides academic information and sources for the additional information. The information gives clarity to the preexisting article.

 Sources and References 

The bibliography is vast with lots of additional information and sources that make the topic of the article richer.

 Organization 

The editor created additional headings for this section under the topic and was broken up into easy-to-read paragraphs.

Images and Media

No images or media as been added to the article as of yet. Perhaps a photograph of the people working with new art media or someone who was a key asset in its development.

 Overall Impressions 

I like how the editor chose relevant information that adds depth to the topic. The editor has made positive changes to the article. It's not easy working on a preexisting article, your contributions are appreciated. Drpencil9 (talk) 23:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)