User:Jerrial/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Oakland Zoo

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I've visited this zoo before, and I wanted to learn how it became so expansive.

Evaluate the article

 * The article's lead section is very concise, and it mentions majority of the article's lead sections.
 * The article provides an equal amount of information in each section.
 * No section is way longer than another section.
 * The article doesn't cite all the facts mentioned.
 * The article is written from a neutral viewpoint.
 * Although there are very few references, the references listed are reliable.
 * The page has been edited several times, but I don't see much conversation on the talk page.
 * Overall, the article is well-written. It is concise and easy to read, but I feel as if there could be a little more information added.