User:Jersey gal202/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1
Article Title:


 * Angelshark
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is a somewhat well-developed article in the B class. Although it has 19 cited sources, some of them are not very recent sources. Because it is a B class article, it is a developed article, but it can still be added to, and there is certainly a lot of relevant information and studies related to Angelsharks that can be added into the article.
 * Sources
 * Angelshark
 * Angelshark

Option 2

 * Article Title
 * Smoothback Angelshark


 * Article Evaluation
 * This article has been rated in the start class article for the angelshark species. This makes it a good article to work in because it has not been well developed and the information that is currently on the page is limited. There is also only one referenced source on the Wikipedia article ,which means it could use a lot more information. Even though there is not a ton of information regarding the specific species of angelshark, there is some information that is more recent that can be added to the article.
 * Sources
 * Smoothback angelshark

Option 3

 * Japenese angelshark
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is surprisingly more developed than that of its neighboring species, the smoothback and the sawback angelsharks. It has been rated GA, for good article, which is even higher than the species angelshark's Wikipedia page, which is rated at a B class article. This means this shark was more studied and had more information studied on it. Although it only has 13 sources, the sources are good quality and up to date studies on the species. Overall, it is not a good article to add to because it had already been significantly worked on and developed by other Wikipedia editors.
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is surprisingly more developed than that of its neighboring species, the smoothback and the sawback angelsharks. It has been rated GA, for good article, which is even higher than the species angelshark's Wikipedia page, which is rated at a B class article. This means this shark was more studied and had more information studied on it. Although it only has 13 sources, the sources are good quality and up to date studies on the species. Overall, it is not a good article to add to because it had already been significantly worked on and developed by other Wikipedia editors.


 * Sources
 * Japanese angelshark

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Shark


 * Article Evaluation
 * As would be expected, this article has a multitude of information on it regarding the species of sharks. This makes sense because sharks are a very large sect of species and accounts for the many different types of subspecies in the shark umbrella. This article is rated GA article and has almost two hundred sources, 195 to be exact. Since sharks themselves aren't in danger, this is more of a broad article that encompasses many different species.


 * Sources
 * Shark

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources