User:Jerzy/Past Archive Phases

User:Jerzy/Current phase is self documenting. After using it to update this page, move User talk:Jerzy to the new archive and replace the resulting Rdr's content with

before copying likely-to-continue discussions back to the resulting new User talk:Jerzy. :'' The remainder of this section is dynamically transcluded from my "Past Archive Phases" page. '' These phases can be used not only for their text, but also for verifying the date & time when specific edits occurred and what registered or "IP" user at Wikipedia made the edits, via each phase's edit history. ''' Notes re history irregularities. '''
 * The Phase 09 page covers discussions active during 2009 July.
 * The Phase 08 page covers discussions active during 2009 June 21 (at noon) -30.
 * The Phase 07 page covers discussions active during 2009 June 16- 21 (at noon).
 * The Phase 06 page covers discussions active during 2009 June 1-15.
 * Progress report: (I got lazy; i should have cut Phase 6 off in mid-June due to high volume, but here it is mid-July.) I think i won't have "to break the pattern" after all, instead splitting the history (and content), with hindsight, at the points where i would have if i had had foresight abt the volume of upcoming discussions! Phase 06 (temporary) is not a phase, but a work space: i moved the talk page there to start accumulating new discussion on the newest User talk:Jerzy page, and now am in the process of undeleting portions of the temp to provide both the edit history and the content (after removing excess) of several new phases. I'll continue to update this template to provide current guidance, mostly a little ahead of actual implementation. Some archived content will temporarily be available only to admins, at times when i'm fairly actively working on this process.
 * The Phase 05 page covers discussions active during 2009 May.
 * The Phase 04 page covers discussions active during 2009 April.
 * The Phase 03 page covers 2009 February 1 through March 31 discussion-starts; although the voluminous discussion concerning a dispute resolution process is mentioned and linked (and "included by reference") from the point at which it originated (on the talk page that has been renamed to Phase 03), its content is at my Proofreader77 subpage.
 * The Phase 02 page covers 2009 January 1 through 31 discussion-starts.
 * The Phase 01 page covers 2008 September 1 through 2008 December 31 discussion-starts.
 * As to Phase 00 (in the sense of the remaining period talk page's existence):
 * Discussions started from 2006 February 20 to 2008 August 31 are covered, as to both editing history and content, by the Phase 00 page.
 * Discussions started from 2003 Sept. 3 through 2006 February 19 have their discussion content in the "Topical" and "Mixed-topic" archives linked below (directly and via a date-range-organized index pg, respectively); their editing history is presently part of that of the Phase 00 page.
 * If the material were more recent (or if interest is shown) that page history could be subdivided using administrator permissions, producing at least a corresponding separate history for each of the two phase 00 periods just described. The process could certainly be extended to reunite the presumably non-overlapping "Mixed-topic" archives with their respective edit histories. Doing the same for the "Topical" archives would surely be more onerous, and if there are duplications of these discussions in the "Mixed-topic" archives, one copy of the history would have to be manually assembled by copying from the DBMS-generated history pages, and pasting to an ordinary content page.
 * If the material were more recent (or if interest is shown) that page history could be subdivided using administrator permissions, producing at least a corresponding separate history for each of the two phase 00 periods just described. The process could certainly be extended to reunite the presumably non-overlapping "Mixed-topic" archives with their respective edit histories. Doing the same for the "Topical" archives would surely be more onerous, and if there are duplications of these discussions in the "Mixed-topic" archives, one copy of the history would have to be manually assembled by copying from the DBMS-generated history pages, and pasting to an ordinary content page.