User:JessJorge/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Bibliothèques de Montréal
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

"D'abord, l'article se retrouve à l'index des articles à améliorer du Projet:Sciences de l'information et des bibliothèques. L'article est classé dans l'état d'ébauche. La partie Mission a aucune référence. Il y a peu d'information."

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Oui.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Non.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Oui, le Bibliobus.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? La section pourrait être bonifié.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Oui.
 * Is the content up-to-date? À vérifier, mais il me semble que non.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Ce qui est présent semble bon, à vérifier avec les sources fournies. Il semble manquer de l'information dans la section Histoire. La section Mission a besoin d'une référence. Il manque une section Modernisation, et
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: