User:Jesse707/Analytical technique/Maria Massaro Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jesse707


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Analytical Technique: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jesse707/Analytical_technique?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Analytical_technique&oldid=1018689023

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The proposed edits consist of expanding sections within the present article. The article, "Analytical technique" looks like a good article to edit. The content that is proposed to be added is all relevant to the topic, as each bullet point is an analytical technique. It is outlined that the user wants to expand on specific analytical techniques, however there are not many examples of what that would look like. If this is carried out as an edit, I would suggest making the expansions concise. For each analytical technique that is expanded upon, it looks like there is a Wiki article for it. Due to that, it would be helpful to the reader of the article to give an introduction to how that technique is considered analytical. Added content to sections should relate back to the article itself rather than summarize its separate Wiki article.

The sandbox draft shows no citations, just links to the specific Wiki article of each technique. It might be worth it to search for examples in literature that showcases how each technique applies analytically. The proposed edits do not come off as argumentative, although I am unsure of whether this article can be a subject of debate.

Organization is another area that looks to be of interest. Creating headings for the techniques that are to be expanded upon is good. I am not sure if subheadings are necessary. Like before, I believe it would be best to avoid summarizing a technique's specific article. The additions to the "See Also" section is important. It conveys that there is a plethora of techniques available, which was not previously highlighted.

It may be worth it to insert an image of a technique in action, as the article lacks any media.

Overall, the proposed edits add to the article. This specific article will benefit from expansion on the most common and widely used analytical techniques. The article is more complete with these expansions. Formatting of the headers and additions of citations would make the content go further in completing the article.