User:JesseChadder/Staghorn coral/Krrky Peer Review

General info
JesseChadder
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:JesseChadder/Staghorn coral
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Staghorn coral

Evaluate the drafted changes
Clarity: The article draft is very clear, detailed and concise.

Structure: The structure of the article draft flows well and provides information in an order that makes sense to the reader.

Balanced coverage: The article draft and a significant amount of information that makes the overall article much more balanced. The sections on habitat, structure, symbiosis, diet, reproduction (asexual, sexual, coral planula), and threats (overfishing, disease) greatly expand the article and make it much more complete. the amount of information added in each section is appropriate in length and no section dominates the article.

Neutrality: The tone of the article is very neutral and only provides unbiased facts that are supported by a large number of sources.

Sources: The article draft contains an additional 26 sources that greatly strengthen the article. All of the sources are peer reviewed and published in a journal or come from reliable sources such as government websites.

Other improvements: Overall the draft is very well done and requires little improvement. For the final draft, images or diagrams could be used to further strengthen the article.