User:Jesse Babcock/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (Fighting in ice hockey)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I have chosen this article to evaluate because it is an interest of mine, and I want to ensure that there is information I would be able to add to the article if I was to choose this as my project topic.

Lead

 * Guiding questions

The Lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and Cleary describes the articles topic. This includes "Fighting in ice hockey is an established tradition of the sport in North America, with a long history that involves many levels of amateur and professional play and includes some notable individual fights." The Lead does not include a brief description of the article's major sections, but descriptions of professional league's and other penalties. The Lead doesn't include information that is not present in the article. In conclusion, the Lead is concise.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions

The articles content is relevant to the topic and up to date in some areas, but it seems there is information that is missing such as the opinions of the actual players opinions on fighting in hockey.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The article is neutral, but it is nearing the line as it discusses "staged fighting" repeatedly, but adds in the natural point of it being sparked by heat of the moment plays. The article does not attempt to persuade the reader in favour of one position or away from another.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Yes, all the facts in the article are backed up by reliable secondary sources of information and reflect the topic. The links were also all accessible.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The article is well written and it is evident that a lot of time was put into the topic. I wasn't able to find any grammatical errors upon my first read. The article is broken down, although there isn't specifically one on "fighting in the NHL" and talking about how it is less relevant and changed in todays game.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
The article does include well captioned images, although there could be more. The images are also cited correctly but are not laid out visually appealing as some are small.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
The talk page is lively with objections similar to ones I had with the author assuming things such as fighting being a response to rough play, but hockey in itself is rough play.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation
Overall, the status of the article is that it reflects a thorough break down of fighting in ice hockey, but not specifically the NHL in comparison to other leagues. The article can be improved by discussing modern day fighting in hockey, enforcers now are more skilled than what they used to be, etc. The article is developed well, just a tad out dated.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: