User:Jesse Williams1/Cotinis nitida/JuniorSanchez23 Peer Review

General info
Jesse Williams1
 * Whos article are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Jesse Williams1/Cotinis nitida
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cotinis nitida

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

After reviewing the sandbox draft and the posted article, the addition of a lead paragraph helped set the purpose and background of the article. In the sandbox draft the ecology section was well detailed but needs organization to match the typical Wikipedia articles. In the final article it seems have been seperated into smaller sections which made it easier to read. The economic importance section was well detailed with clear references to reliable resources resource, however, some of the points made didn't always have a direct contribution to the economy. This seems to have been fixed in the published article. Overall great article very detailed with great references.