User:Jesse Williams1/Cotinis nitida/Nhaggan Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The article is well written and very informative while using a tone that doesn't appear to be bias. The references appear to be reliable and great aid to the document. The users did a great job at improving the original article.