User:Jessica.jfrancis/Evaluate an Article

Clinical physiology
(Provide a link to the article here.)

I chose this article as I take great interest in the medical field.
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

== This article contains a good lead which prefaces the topic of the article without including irrelevant information. The content in this article is relevant, but there is not much to be said about this topic. This article is written from a neutral point of view, it does not attempt to persuade the reader. Roughly each section of this article contains 2 citations, however, there could be more. The article is broken down into clear, concise sections that are easy to follow. The talk page contains discussion about references, history citations, and broken links. This article's strengths include clear organization, neutral tone, and overall good content. The article's weaknesses, or areas for improvement, include little information on the topic and very few citations. ==

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)