User:JessicaVDH/Forensic footwear evidence/Enatti0108 Peer Review

General info
JessicaVDH
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Forensic footwear evidence
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Forensic footwear evidence
 * Forensic footwear evidence

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

In the lead of this article there weren 't too many changes made however, after reading it it was obvious that a large change was not necessary. The very first sentence told the reader what the article was going to be about and what exactly forensic footwear evidence is. for the most part the lead provides a brief explanation of what will be found in the body of the article. However, I feel some aspects of the major sections of the article could have been highlighted a little bit clearer. I feel the lead had a great amount of information and was not overwhelming. It told the reader the perfect amount of information about the topic.

The content in this article was spot on and very up to date. I did not find any gaps in information and anyone who was looking to learn about this topic could definitely use this wiki article as a great start. It was also neutral throughout the entire article and bias was not present. I did not feel any topic was over or under represented and there was no information designed to compel the reader to feel a certain way.

In the article there was some information that was not backed up by a citation (especially in the first few sections of the body and in the lead). However, the references used do show the available information on the topic and it was all fairly current. From what I could tell all links in the article worked well however, I feel more wiki links could have been added to the article.

The organization in this article was fantastic. It was very easy to read and I especially liked how if you were looking for something specific in the article such as the limitations or different databases for forensic footwear evidence you can easily scroll and find it. Each paragraph also had the perfect amount of information and did not drag on.

Great images! they all reflected what was being discussed in the article and gave the reader an even deeper understanding of what was being explained.

Overall great job! I thoroughly enjoyed reading this article and seeing the changes made by the editor.