User:Jessicacezar/Udara blackburnii/Gedrickt Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jessicacezar


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jessicacezar/Udara_blackburnii?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Udara blackburnii

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you? I like how this user already has things down like different sections and they were able to cite at the end of the sentence.
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way? Description
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? Yes
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? One of them is from a museum but I am wary about the hawaiianforest one because the sources that the guy used at the bottom are both from Wikipedia.
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Grab more sources, because it's just 2 websites used really
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? It would make the user seem more credible and knowledgeable on their subject which would make them able to write more sections
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? No, and the changes I stated in #3 ^
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Touch up the sections, fix some punctuation and capitalization of words, get more sources, finish bibliography, because it is empty.
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? If I can find info on it I will definitely add a cultural significance portion to my article