User:Jessicacezar/Udara blackburnii/Shurwill Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jessicacezar


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Jessicacezar/Udara blackburnii - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Editing User:Jessicacezar/Udara blackburnii - Wikipedia

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.) The article did well in describing the organism as well as where it is endemic too.
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you? The inclusion of the larval stage optimal habitat.
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way? The overall description of the organism.
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes.
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? Yes.
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes.
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? reputable.
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Maybe look for a few more sources because I only see 2.
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? More information from different reputable sources,
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? Definitely a great start, needs some work here and there but overall, its good.
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?  Find more sources so they can find more information.
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Definitely the little numbers on each sentence>