User:Jessicaduran1809/Bell Site/Huong N Peer Review

General info

 * Username: Jessicaduran1809
 * Link to draft: User:Jessicaduran1809/Bell Site

Lead

 * The Lead has been updated to reflect the new content added. However, the Lead shouldn't have title -i.e. "Bell Site, Grand Village of the Meskwaki" should be removed.
 * The Lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.
 * The Lead's brief description of the article's major sections is somewhat lacking and should be expanded.
 * The Lead does not include information that is not present in the article.

Content

 * The content added is relevant to the site and up-to-date.
 * The last two sentences "Through the remains found at site... the level of respect they had for them." of the first section do not reflect correctly the main points of the article and need to be reviewed.

Tone and Balance

 * The content added is neutral and there is no claims that appear biased toward a particular position.
 * The function or significant of the site is underrepresented.
 * The content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

Sources and References

 * The content is not backed up by a reliable secondary source of information.

For New Articles Only

 * No sources have been added.

Overall impressions

 * The content added was significant and had improved the overall quality of the article.
 * The content added gave a good basic information about the site.
 * The geography section can be expand or describe on more detail (e.g. description of houses, stone wall remains, digs, or ritual ground)

Overall evaluation
- Overall this is a good start. The "Animals of significant" section is well written.