User:Jessicamarutani/2-Fluoroadenine/Caroline.Alexandre59 Peer Review

General info
Jessicamarutani
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jessicamarutani/2-Fluoroadenine?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):2-Fluoroadenine

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead was updated and it accurately reflects the new content that was added to the article. The lead also includes an introductory sentence that gives the audience a general overview of the article. Due to the article being short, there is not a brief description included, indicating that the lead consists of information that was not already seen in the article.

Content: The content added to this article is relevant, as it speaks on the functions and how 2-flouroadenine can be used in research aspects like cancer treatments. The content added was backed up by three sources which I checked and they were reliable, as I was able to find them through the Hunter Collage Library Database.

Tone and Balance: It is a well written edit, in which I see no bias in the content, as it proves to be neutral. There are no claims that would be considered to sway the audience towards a particular stance.

Sources and References: The sources were current and contributed to the information displayed. One of the sources was out of the 5 year range, as it was published in 1969, but the other 2 sources were within the range. All the sources were peer-reviewed articles, showing a good use of secondary sources. I was able to find more sources that could possibly be used for this article as well, but overall I think the sources provided were more than adequate.

Images and Media: No images or media were added.

Organization: There are no grammatical or spelling errors. The content was well-organized as it first explained 2-fluoroadenine, and then provided information on how it serves as an inhibitor and a type of cancer treatment. The article does meet the notability requirement, as it contains the two sources that directly correlate to the information being shown.

Thoughts: I thought the use of the functions gave the article a research aspect, which is very informative for the readers and gives a better understanding. The editor wrote this in their own words, as this article does not follow a pattern. The addition to the stub is valuable because it gives insight on 2-fluoroadenine's functions which any reader can find as a great contribution! Overall, I think this edit provides good information to the article, as it displays the functions of 2-Fluoroadenine and how it is synthesized.