User:Jessicawhita/Slacktivism

Article Evaluation:
Focus on the article's content, tone, and sourcing.


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Are some areas under- or over-developed?
 * The article's content is all relevant to the topic. Some areas (mostly the criticism and defense sections) are underdeveloped.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * The article is written neutrally; however, there are some sentences that are difficult to understand (***note to clean up sentences structure/grammar).
 * Does each claim have a citation? Are the citations reliable?
 * The sources need to be improved. There are some references in the bibliography that are not being used in the article, some references are blogs, and not all claims are referenced.
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * This article does not tackle any equity gaps that I have picked up on.