User:Jesus051/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Academic English

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because its somewhat related to the course and it seems interesting. It matters because it talks about helping students use language appropriately for study. A program that helps student with academic english. My preliminary impression of it was that I found it intriguing, organized, but it seemed a little short.

Evaluate the article
The lead section seems fine. The introductory sentence clearly and concisely describes the articles topic. As far as content, everything seems relevant to the topic. Not much that distracted me and everything seems to belong there. The article is also from a neutral point of view so thats good. There seems to be no bias when it talks about the topic. It talks about the debate over the best way to help students with academic english but includes both sides and no bias. It doesn't attempt to persuade. All facts in the article are also backed up by a reliable source. There is possibly just one that isn't that current. In terms of organization, everything seems organized and concise. Their information is organized into sections and the writing is clear and professional. The article does not contain any images. In the talk page there were people that improved the article. Such as fixing grammar and typos, removing irrelevant information, and adding links. It doesn't seem to be part of any wiki projects. Overall, I think this article is good due to many editors efforts in improving it. The articles strengths is that it is very organized, concise, and there seems to be no irrelevant information. The article can be improved by including more up to date references. Based on the topic, I think the article is well developed to an extent but theres always room for improvement so adding a little more relevant information wouldn't hurt.