User:Jesusjc3/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Bilingual education
 * This topic is related to the language we speak and its different characteristics

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it gives us the definition and it provides different information about the topic
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, it is all the necessary information
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? it is concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, it presents all the information about Bilingual education.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Yes, This page was last edited on 6 September 2019, at 17:22.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, I think it has all the information that it needs.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article neutral? Yes, it presents formal information, without giving personal opinions.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, all the format it is trying to give information only.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, all the format it is trying to give information only.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, all the format it is trying to give information only.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, all this page has a lot of references and it is well-cited.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, we can find different sources that provide us more information.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, they are. We can found references made in 2019.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, all the links work correctly.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the reading becomes easy with the structure that this page has.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? I did not find any.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, it is broken into different sections.

Images and Media
Guiding questions:


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Not really
 * Are images well-captioned? Yes, it has information about the picture.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes, the picture is cited.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Not really

Checking the talk page
Guiding questions:


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? A lot of suggestions for making changes to the article.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Yes, This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It presents more information, and it is a different format.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * What is the article's overall status? Good information.
 * What are the article's strengths? It has a lot of references and backup information.
 * How can the article be improved? Making some corrections in some sentences to become more fluid.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Well-developed