User:Jeswinning/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Article title: Racism in the United States - Section: MIddle Eastern and South Asian Americans
 * 1) Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Well not quite, they have South Asian Americans in the introductory paragraph of the whole large article and in the sub heading, but in the actual context they only speak a few sentences about Asian Americans.
 * 2) Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I think it speaks pretty neutral. stating facts as they happen.
 * 3) Are there viewpoints that are over-represented, or underrepresented? Viewpoints of the South Asian Americans is entirely underrepresented in the entire article.
 * 4) Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? yes
 * 5)  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? yes, information comes from scholarly websites. Sources are neutral mostly. yes, writer uses phrases like, "It has been argued"
 * 6) Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? nope
 * 7)  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? Peer editing, questions of some items of relevance.
 * 8) How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? C-class high importance.
 * 9) How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?  it tries to be neutral, not a lot of feelings are input.