User:Jevega2001/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Bleach (manga): Bleach (manga)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate:

I took the decision of this topic, knowing that something that I could really relate to. After all, it did not take me much time to decide since I have read and seen the series before. It was the senses that acted quickly when seeing that it something that I am really passionate about.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
- '''Given the main information about the decided article, it demonstrates a fairly accurate topic about the series. It gives you very formal information about the article that has been analyzed and summarized. It seems too detailed about those who want to know the series, but to those who have already provided information before the series, by the looks of it, is very well concise.'''

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Content evaluation
- '''Observing the articles, it did not seem to have any missing content. The content was very precises and incredibly open about the series and tells it in a unique way that someone who got the knowledge, could understand it clearly. The article itself seems to be very updated, seeing that this page was last edited on September13, 2020, at 03:47pm. Nevertheless, the content of the series has already wrap up in a successful Japanese manga, ending the series on August 22, 2016.'''

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
'''- The presentation of the plot in the article is very neutral and easily detailed. It shows that is quite a simple summary of the series but still capture a lot of the story and setting of the series. Although, it represents more of the setting than its own main character, is needed to be overrepresent by the fact that the series capture a lot of other detail away from the main story of the character. Saying that if anyone is interest in the series and want obtain a specific information of the story before viewing it, the reader has to know little more about the background of the series to be able to understand it more clearly.'''

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
- '''Other than the facts of the article, I obtain the knowledge by seeing the series itself. To that, I was able to obtain most of the information that I now see gathered in the article. It is confirmed that it also reflects the story by different kind of style of literature called “manga” that is very well known in the Japanese literary culture. The book is still currently available in different sites or get a copy of the book now that is still recognized.'''

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
- '''The article gives a clear path of the story, without any grammatical error committed, but it may be complicated to read. For someone who is relying only on the article will see a different perception of one that already knows the origin of the story and may affect the way you read it. However, the article has a good organization within the story and reflects the major topic that comes in the series.'''

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
- '''I saw that as a big error in the article, by the fact that it did no demonstrate what it need to be one of the main part for when you want to obtain the clearest information possible. There are low signs off imagery on the article of the series. However, it enhances an understanding of the topic, showing one of their only photos, identifying the main character and the setting of what the article classifies.'''

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Talk page evaluation
- '''Searching and analyzing about the article, it seems fully accurate being on C-Class. Still, it could not be a failure since it gives you very precise and well general topic of the article and did not differ from the Wikipedia and from what we discuss in class. Nonetheless, if you already read the article and still want a little more information, the manga series has been part of  WikiProject Anime and manga. It collaborate the work to improve the attention of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia.'''

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Overall evaluation
- '''The article could be in a good condition, but not in its prime. One of the main problems that I was able to captivate is the low signs of imagery in the article, since it is important for the reader to know what he observes and reads, creating more interest towards what he is analyzing. However, the article shows a good strength on the different topics of the series. In other words, it is confirmed that the status of the article illustrates a good topic on what is commented on when reading.'''

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: