User:Jewelzmae/2007 African floods/JBecker370 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Jewelzmae
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Jewelzmae/2007 African floods

Lead is presumed to be relevant

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
Good start! Just expand more on the content.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation
Well done! It's well balanced.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
 * Are the sources current? Yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Good and relevant sources

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, but more details and information could be added.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No. Looks good.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes. It is broken down by country.

Organization evaluation
Good. Easy to read and decipher.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, more specific information on various regions were added.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Puts the human cost of the floods into perspective
 * How can the content added be improved? Be more specific in terms of location. Possibly add the lasting impact of the floods.

Overall evaluation
Good detail was added. Now the detail just needs to be expanded.