User:Jezhotwells/Notabilty (plays)

This page gives some rough guidelines intended to be used by Wikipedia editors to decide whether a play should or should not have an article on Wikipedia. While satisfying these notability guidelines generally indicates a play warrants an article, failing to satisfy them is not a criterion for speedy deletion.

These guidelines may be considered a specialized version of Notability, applied to plays, reflecting the core Wikipedia policies, including the following:
 * Wikipedia articles must not be vehicles for advertisement
 * Verifiability
 * No original research
 * Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information
 * Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

Claims of notability must adhere to Wikipedia's policy on verifiability; it is not enough to simply assert that a play meets a criterion without substantiating that claim with reliable sources.

"Notability" as used herein is not a reflection of a play's merit. A play may be brilliantly written or performed, fascinating and topical, while still not being notable enough to ensure sufficient verifiable source material exists to create an encyclopedia article about that play.

Coverage notes
Though the concept of "play" is widely defined, this guideline does not yet provide specific notability criteria for the following types of publications: dramatic sketches or revues, although it does apply to librettos. Specific guidelines may be developed. Until then, this guideline may be instructive by analogy.

The criteria set forth below apply to plays published in electronic form (or e-books).

Criteria
A play is generally notable if it verifiably meets through reliable sources, one or more of the following criteria:
 * 1) The play has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the play itself. This includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, other books, television documentaries and reviews. Some of these works should contain sufficient critical commentary to allow the article to grow past a simple plot summary. This excludes media re-prints of press releases, promotional copy, or other publications where the author, its publisher, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the play.
 * 2) The play has won a major theatrical award.
 * 3) The play has been considered by reliable sources to have made a significant contribution to a notable motion picture, or other art form, or event or political or religious movement.
 * 4) The play is the subject of instruction at multiple grade schools, high schools,  universities or post-graduate programs in any particular country.
 * 5) The play's author is so historically significant that any of his or her written works may be considered notable. This does not simply mean that the play's author is him/herself notable by Wikipedia's standards; rather that the play's author is of exceptional significance and the author's life and body of work would be a common study subject in literature classes.

These criteria are presented as rules of thumb for easily identifying plays that Wikipedia should probably have articles about. In almost all cases, a thorough search for independent, third-party reliable sources will be successful for a play meeting one or more of these criteria. However, meeting these criteria is not an absolute guarantee that Wikipedia should have a separate, stand-alone article entirely dedicated to the play.

Threshold standards
Published plays should have at a minimum an ISBN (for those published after 1975), be available at a dozen or more libraries and be catalogued by its country of origin's official or de facto national library. For example, in the United States published plays are catalogued by the Library of Congress; United Kingdom at the British Library; Australia at the National Library of Australia; Canada at the Library and Archives Canada; France at the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Singapore at the National Library Board; in Brazil by the Fundação Biblioteca Nacional; Argentina at Biblioteca Nacional de la República Argentina; and in India at the National Library of India. For a complete list, see List of national libraries.

However, these are exclusionary criteria rather than inclusionary; meeting these threshold standards does not imply that a play is notable, whereas a play which does not meet them, most likely is not. There will be exceptions—plays that are notable despite not meeting these threshold standards—but they will be rare and good reasons for the notability of such plays should be made very clear.

Self-publication
In this regard, it should be especially noted that self-publication and/or publication by a vanity press indicates, but does not establish non-notability. Exceptions do exist, however.

Taking the preceding threshold section into account, it should be noted that many vanity press plays are assigned ISBN numbers, may be listed in a national library, and may be found through a Google Book Search, none of which implies they are notable.

It should always weigh against an article's inclusion if the author or another interested party is the creator of the Wikipedia article. See Conflict of interest and Autobiography for more information.

Online bookstores
A published play's listing at online bookstores such as Barnes & Noble.com or Amazon.com is not by itself an indication of notability as both websites are non-exclusionary, including large numbers of vanity press publications. There is no present agreement on how high a play must fall on Amazon's sales rank listing (in the "product details" section for a play's listing) in order to provide evidence of its notability or non-notability.

Not yet produced or published plays
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Articles about plays that are not yet published or produced are strongly discouraged and such articles are only accepted under criteria other than those provided in this guideline, typically because the anticipation of the play is notable in its own right. In such cases there should still be multiple independent sources providing strong evidence that the play will be performed, which sources include the title of the play and an approximate date of production.

Non-contemporary plays
From a pragmatic standpoint, the vast majority of plays upon which articles are written which invite a notability judgment call and which find their way to articles for deletion, are from the modern era. Nevertheless, the notability of playss written or published much earlier may occasionally be disputed and the criteria proposed above intended primarily for modern plays may not be as suitable. We suggest instead a more common sense approach which considers whether the play has been widely cited or written about, whether it has been recently produced, the fame that the play enjoyed in the past and its place in the history of theatre.

Derivative articles
It is a general consensus on Wikipedia that articles on plays should not be split and split again into ever more minutiae of detail treatment, with each split normally lowering the level of notability. What this means is that while a play may be notable, it is not normally advisable to have a separate article on a character or thing from the play, and it is often the case that despite the play being manifestly notable, a derivative article from it is not. Exceptions do, of course, exist—especially in the case of very famous plays. For example few would argue that William Shakespeare's playHamlet does not warrant a 'subarticle' on its protagonist, Prince Hamlet. When a play has been split too finely to support the notability of individual subtopics, merging content back into the play article is appropriate.

In some situations, where the play itself does not fit the established criteria for notability, or if the play is not notable but the author has an article in Wikipedia, it may be better to feature material about the play in the author's article, rather than creating a separate article for that play.

Resources

 * Clicking on any linked ISBN number on Wikipedia takes you to Special:Booksources where preformatted links for the specific published play are provided, allowing access to multiple library catalogues, bookseller databases and other book resources.
 * This might be an issue as different formats of a published play (i.e. ebook, audiobook, printed book) will have different ISBNs, and they will often not be sequential, especially for older plays that were originally published before ebooks or audiobooks existed.


 * Library of Congress Online Catalog: A searchable database useful in identifying publisher, edition, etc.
 * The British Library's online catalogue.
 * The Literary Encyclopedia: 3300 profiles of authors, works and literary and historical topics and references of 18,000 works.
 * Norton anthology of world literature: Useful in the exploration of world literature.
 * Worldcat: search for a play in library catalogues. Contains 1.8 billion items in 18,000 libraries worldwide.
 * Questia Online Library, allows full-text search, and paid subscription reading access to 64,000+ books and 1,000,000+ journal, magazine, and newspaper articles in their collection. Their strength is full text of recent academic books by major publishers such as Oxford University Press, University of North Carolina Press, and Greenwood Press, along with thousands of older academic books that are available only in larger university libraries.