User:Jfelmgart/Evaluate an Article

Which articles are you evaluating?

 * 1) Talara
 * 2) Forest restoration

Why you have chosen these articles to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)


 * 1) I chose this article based on it being relevant to my class and studies and it looked well written and informative.
 * 2) I chose this article because it outlines a different view of reforestation that highlights restoration and conservation.

Evaluate the articles
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * 1) Its content is relevant and concise. The tone is neutral and the sources are well cited and referenced. It is organized and well-written, but the article lacks images and media to make it more interesting and visually appealing. The one climate chart is very helpful, but having more photos especially would be a great way to increase its visual appeal.
 * 2) The content has relevant, up to date content that is concise. It would also benefit greatly from photos later on in the article, though the beginning has some great ones with informative captions. The talk page does not seem super up to date but it is a part of multiple C-class groups.