User:Jg6446/Encrasicholina purpurea/Miyajo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Jg6446


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jg6446/Encrasicholina_purpurea?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Encrasicholina purpurea

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.) What the article does well is the formatting and the structuring of the different sections in the article draft. Thank you! The structure took me a while to get down because I didn't know what I should add or leave out, so I'm glad it turned out okay.
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you? What impressed me is how they added the links that go onto another wikipedia article. I actually don't remember if I did that intentionally or if Wikipedia automatically did that for me.
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way? A turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way was in the description section where they mentioned having fewer gill rakers and a shorter maxilla than a buccaneer anchovy. It's a good thing one of my sources has a some good comparisons. I'll try to include more if it fits anywhere.
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes, they have links with multiple sources in their article. It was annoying when I had to manually put in the info for some sources and other stuff but I'm glad it all worked out and I finished them.
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? They mention how the species differs from other species that is similar to that one. Yeah the article already had a few comparisons and I just added some to expand on the species.
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? There is a reference list at the bottom with the little numbers. I'm glad Wikipedia's /reflist does the reference list automatically.
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? The quality of the sources are really good, they have a few journals and they have reliable organizations for their website sources as well. I remember it took me a long time to find enough sources that also met the standards, pretty frustrating stuff.
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? I think that adding a little more information would help a little more, I think it's really good already though. Yeah I definitely need to add some more info and fill out the article more. In the draft I didn't because I just wanted a basic outline with some info to get a picture of what it could be, but now I really should start filling it out more.
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? Those changes would help expand on the species a bit more.
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? I think it's pretty ready to see on Wikipedia, it sounds like an article I would read off of the website. Thank you! And yeah the sections are pretty barren right now so I will definitely add more info soon.
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? The most important thing the author could do to improve the article would be adding more information with the sources they have, the sources are really good and I think a little more expanding would help the article a bit more. Will do.
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I really liked the human use section, I could add that if I can find any good sources on my species on that topic. That sounds like a good idea! Human use is important so it would be a good section to add and for readers to learn about.