User:Jg98915/Mycobacterium leprae/Miyamoto4 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Bab35555, Jg98915, Mew77356, Sydneybokor


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jg98915/Mycobacterium_leprae?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mycobacterium leprae

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There is no content in the sandbox draft for this article, However, some references have been added to the "bibliography" section. The content intended for this article may be on a word document in a private location before the group transfers it to wiki.

Due to no available content within the sandbox draft, the current version of the article will be reviewed.

Lead section: This section is not overly detailed and includes a brief description of the bacteria in a short paragraph which is then expanded upon in the rest of the article.

Content: The content remains on topic, is updated regularly, and provides plenty of information regarding morphology/physiology, pathology, history, distribution and clinical importance.

Tone and Balance: Neutrality appears to be maintained throughout the article. No content seems to be biased toward a particular position.

Sources and References: There are abundant sources to choose from. They range from current studies within the last couple of years to historical documents that date back to the 19th century. All links that were tested still work.

Organization and writing quality: The article provides clear information and remains on topic. No spelling or grammatical errors are apparent and all sections are organized well.

Images and Media: Several images are included that help to clarify the written content. All images include detailed enough descriptions.

Talk page discussion: This article was part of another Wiki course assignment that occurred in 2019. Past discussions and issues with the article seem to have been addressed.

Overall impressions: This is a well thought out and detailed article. It has a strong lead section that gets immediately to the point while more information is added and fleshed out in the interior. There are also enough images to aid with illustrating certain topics. Some articles have been added from the last few years that include up to date impacts of the pathogen from around the globe.