User:Jgarvizu/sandbox

Article: Anthropocene

 * The content of this article stays focused onto the important aspects: where the term came from, why it is important in ecological studies, when the Anthropocene started according to different arguments, and what caused this term to be acknowledged in recent history.
 * The article is neutral in the sense that it covers most of the alternate views of Anthropocene, but in the case of this topic it seems somewhat undefined in terms of when this era starts through the article itself. The way information is exhaustive, but seems to dilute the importance of what the Anthropocene means for society. Any differing opinions on this topic are stubbed into the final section labeled "In culture", Although I do not think that exploring the views that claim this idea as purely a social construct and other similar ways of analyzing this idea do not add much to addressing the problems that led to society recognizing human impact on the earth.
 * The links to sources are working well and the sources are mainly from peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and reputable news sources. No questionable sources found from the References section. Up-to-date for the most part, mid 90s are the oldest citations found in this article.
 * Not much recent conversation on the Talk board, some older discussions found this article getting merged with the Homogenocene page. Discussions place some concern about resolving the difficulty found in drawing the line to when this era began.
 * This article is rated as a Start-Class by the WikiProjects Geology and Time, but rated with a Mid-Importance by the Geology WikiProject.
 * This article differs to the way it was discussed through lecture, in the sense from reading this article gives the reader uncertainty in the wrong way by giving possibly too much differing information in origin when the importance of this article is create awareness of human society on the environment and climate through capitalism and how shaping opinions through PR campaigns to reduce meaningful discourse about the Anthropocene.

Further Revisions:

 * 1) Updating past information to reflect the current state of the Access Economy e.g., with revenues of 2015 being posted, adding more specific figures for different businesses could help highlight a company's influence.
 * 2) Adding more pros/cons to 5. Economic effects section, I think more information can be found in the cons area and reflect a better picture of who benefits and loses in this model. More information can be brought to effects on particular industries instead of just the taxi cab industry.
 * 3) With enough research, it could be possible to add a section called "Participant effects" or something closely related where it discusses how this model of economics effect the works that operate under the access economy and can balance out with the benefits seen at the company level.
 * 4) Adding a a new section of regulations on companies that are not Uber or Airbnb, if enough research is available.
 * 5) More information should be added to the Uber section under Regulations and Legislation to show how other major markets/governments react to the access economy.