User:Jguti174/Lani Hotch/Cessrrrr Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) .    User:Jguti714
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No the draft has not been updated except for the headings.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? No it does not.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No brief description is shown.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No it does not.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? N/A

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? There is no content.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?N/A
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?N/A

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? There is no content.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No it does not.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? There are no viewpoints.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No positions.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No sources shown.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? No content has been written.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? There are no images added.
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? No it does not meet them.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? No it does not.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Only follows the pattern of section headings..
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? No it does not.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? None has been added.
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
There is only a week left before it is due.This article takes a while to make, so you should start as soon as possible. Begin by fully understanding all the training modules.Once you have done that it should be much easier to complete the assignment.