User:JhanysG/Kissing The Witch/WalkingAsGiants Peer Review

General info
JhanysG
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:JhanysG/Kissing The Witch
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead is good. It is lacking some important things such as publication date, history, and otherwise. The Content seems well organized but the bibliography seems more focused around the Styles, Themes, and Reception over the actual bulk of the text which is the summary of 13 separate stories. The actual book itself is not cited, which could be beneficial. The framework of this article is very good and the topics the author is planning to go into are well researched and backed by credible sources, however, the groundwork should not be the responses to the book, but to the book itself when doing an encyclopedic take, at least that was my understanding. I would recommend going through the basic information about the book first and foremost, such as the summaries, publication, picture, and formatting before moving on to the fun and spicy stuff such as critical acclaim, queer representation and reception. Also a picture would be good but I haven't added my picture so I'm in no place for saying much.

You do have plenty of sources especially for a new article, and that is fantastically done. You do need to add infoboxes, but once again, I haven't even done that yet and I don't know where everyone else is. One thing you do have is a really fantastic skeleton for the layout and enough sources to start writing... except in the actual summaries and publication history because you don't have the book yet.