User:Jhnola/Neighborhoods in New Orleans/VikAlexander Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Jhnola
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Neighborhoods in New Orleans

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Not that I can tell
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? There is a contents chart, and vaguely mentions it in the introduction sentence, but it could be stronger.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, all thirteen districts are counted for, and all 72 neighborhoods are listed. They need work and explanations though, extremely vague in the actual article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It seems pretty concise, although a tad vague.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Content has not been added yet, bit what is present is on topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? All content so far seems up to date for the most part.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? One references mentions 85 neighborhoods of New Orleans, however, the beginning sentence only mentions 72.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Under "other divisions and designations" it vaguely goes into a historical conversation, however there is no true history in it. Neighborhoods that have history and are often underrepresented aren't mentioned in this conversation. There is also no explanation on the neighborhood differences, or even the districts.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The current content is very neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I did not see any obvious bias.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Essentially, every neighborhood and district are underrepresented with a lack of information.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, the lack of information in itself makes that impossible. The content available is extremely neutral, but there is very little to go off of.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? No, that is very much lacking.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current? The sources seem out of date since the links don't work anymore.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? It's hard to tell since they won't load, but they are very official if they did work.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Nolahoods.com does not work, City of NOLA Data Portal doesn't show any information when loaded, Greater New Orleans Community Data Center does not work, but the last link works

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Somewhat, the lack of information makes reading the article very quick. The information present is simple to read, but so much is lacking from the article.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I did not catch any grmmatical or spelling errors.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? it has the setup of a good outline for sections, just no actual information in said outline.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? There are no images, however, it would be cool to see a picture of each district at the very least.
 * Are images well-captioned? The captions could be of what area of the district the photo is, or even the different neighborhoods if shown.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? There are no images to say so, but make sure to cite where the images are from when including them.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Again, the photos could be placed at the beginning of each district, and if possible an image of each neighborhood could be included by their titles.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? No, the sources need lots of updating.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? There could be more history on the neighborhoods and maybe general history on New Orleans and how the districts came about.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? There is a rough outline, however, the information isn't there. The outline itself is promising.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes there are several as recommended.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? This article is far from complete.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content available shows a good outline, and a promising set up for information to be input.
 * How can the content added be improved? It could be improvved with more information, photos, and more history.