User:Jhornsby2019/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Triple-A Syndrome

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this because I thought this syndrome was very interesting and I have not heard of it before, so I wanted to learn more about it.

Evaluate the article
This article had really good sections, such as Presentation, Cause, Diagnosis, and Treatment. I think the diagnosis section should be divided up on each way to diagnose and go deeper into those. The treatment section is pretty light as well. I think it should not be categorized as treatment, since there is no definitive cure. I would change the label to pain management and go more in depth about each. For example, It says that surgical intervention can be used. It does not touch on what the surgery entails and how it improves the passage of food and drink into the stomach. The citations seem reliable and it seems to be written in a neutral point of view, which is good. Each claim has a citation of a hyperlink after it. Overall this article is good but I would go more into detail.

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)