User:Jhulty/Film criticism/Oreyes92 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

jhulty


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Doesn't seem to be a link to sandbox unless i am not looking correctly.


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Film criticism

Evaluate the drafted changes
After looking through your history of changes, I am quite impressed with the amount of dedication and work you have put into this article. You did little things such as correcting grammar and punctuation, to citing existing work correctly, to even incorporating an image, and adding a substantial amount of relevant information regarding academia and film criticism.

 LEAD After reading the lead paragraph that introduces Film Criticism, I found it to be a great introduction to the topic and incorporates, a solid definition of what Film criticism is, and the sub categories under it relating to journalistic criticism and academic criticism.

 CONTENT/ORGANIZATION 

Really liked the conciseness of the table of contents as well as the order and organization of everything in the article. as i mentioned before, the information you added into the lead paragraph really helped with providing readers with a quick rundown of what is to be expected in the article and i believe it helps with the flow and understanding of the content within the article. If i am reading the article revision history correctly, I see that you added information related to online film criticism and talked about websites such as rotten tomatoes and Metacritic, which I saw as great and relevant information that helps explain what online film criticism is with the use of examples.

 TONE AND BALANCE 

As far as the tone and balance for this article, I found it to be very "flowy" and never really had moments of confusion or moments where things were a bit out of order and caused me to go back and forth mentally. All of the content is neutral and un biased which is great because it feels like i am reading out of a text book rather than reading someone's opinion.

 SOURCES AND REFERNECES 

After looking at the reference page, everything seems to be reliable and cited correctly to the best of my knowledge. I am not good at citing things myself so it is a bit hard for me to say you are or are not making citations correctly yet alone using good references. However, upon browsing through the reference list, everything seems relevant and reliable based on the type of publishers and authors i see in there references.