User:Jhy0815/sandbox

Article Evaluation
I chose WeChat as my article.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

I checked some of the old ones retrieved in 2015 and the new ones retrieved in 2018, and all of them works. It is really amazing that the wikipedia of WeChat is so updated because as one of the most popular social media app in China, WeChat does update a lot, and new functions are continuously created, part of which has become indispensable parts of WeChat now, such as the JumpJump game and Mini Programs. There are 119 references in total and for those i checked, I would say they either are still valid, or they reflect what WeChat was like in the past years.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?

No, so far as i can see.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

I think so. There are 119 references and they come from different resources, in different language and written by different organizations. WeChat is so popular that this item must have been seen by tons of people and checked and edited by different people from around the globe for many time. Even there is something biased, it would be changed in a short time.
 * Nice overview. Would you say that the citations are reliable, fair, and balanced? Jhy0815. --- FULBERT (talk) 14:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)