User:JiachengGeng/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Newton (unit)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because we are learning about acceleration. And N is the unit we will use. My initial impression of this article is good; it looks very detailed.

Evaluate the article
As my first article evaluation, I will evaluate against the list given by Wikipedia and only list what I think is problematic. I don't think there is a problem here if I didn't list it.

The first is the lead section. I don't think Newton's second law of mention should be mentioned in the lead section since that is not the article's topic. The topic of this article is the unit, so the lead section of the article should be concise and used to introduce the unit, not to expand other content.

Then there's the talk page. One topic of the article's talk page is whether Newton should be a disambiguation page. Since the unit of force is named after Isaac Newton, it has at least two meanings. The other is the "average-sized apple" in the example. They think this concept is too vague and should be replaced.

For the other part, articles meet the standards, such as the link's validity and the article's integrity. Overall, this is a good article. If there is something I missed, feel free to point it out.