User:Jiaoyan Zhou/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Argo Tea - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I am very interested in information about tea. In addition, I think many people will search the name of the shop to know whether it is worth trying, so I think this article is very important. My first impression of it is the introduction of the tea shop, including the history and some products.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)


 * lead section
 * I think this lead is almost perfect. It includes an introduction and contains a concise and clear description of the topic of the article. Although the lead is a bit long, reading only the first sentence can give you a general idea of the content. The only thing I think needs to be improved is that it can be written more concisely. I think a little more specific content can be explained in detail in the section.


 * content
 * history
 * I think this article is also excellent in terms of content. In the history section, it tells the original intention of its establishment, and this part has been updated. The current content has been updated to 2011. However, IN my opinion, there is no need to elaborate on the background of the founder in this section, just the shop.
 * product
 * There is a detailed description of the items on the menu, as well as the loose tea for sale. But I suggest that this section should be more detailed, such as the specific names of tea and refreshments, the evaluation of food by gourmets and its nutritional value.
 * Social efforts
 * I think we can add some details here, like the reusable teacups they sell. Search for data on how many cups were sold and how much money was saved.


 * Overall performance
 * The tone is very formal and the content is very neutral
 * The references are basically newspapers or online magazines, which are more convincing.
 * The pictures are good, but there is no picture in the product column, I think it should be added. There is also no picture of the tea cup mentioned in the social impact section.

Overall, the article is perfect except for a few minor problems.