User:Jiayi Yan/Evaluate an Article

The Wiki page about the film Juno is currently rated as a good article by Wiki editors. Following the guidelines of Wiki article evaluation, this page is assessed on its content, tone, and citation. This page opens with a strong lead section and demonstrates a comprehensive and organized coverage on various aspects of the film in a neutral tone, drawing from sources from trade journals and industrial interviews. While it conforms to the standards of a good Wiki article, the page can be improved by a minor revision and reorganization of its content and a more detailed review of its citation.

Lead Section
The lead section is both informative and concise. It provides a general introduction to the film and lays out the structures of the page, which provides readers a strong and clear roadmap.

Relevance
The page revolves closely around the film without redundant and irrelevant informations.

Comprehensiveness
The page provides comprehensive information about various aspects and different stages of the film, from its plot, cast, themes, production, distribution, reception, music, and awards. Under the production section, it covers development, casting, filming, music, design, opening titles.

Organization
While the page provides a thorough and quality coverage of the film, some of its section can be reorganized. Under production, the page has already introduced the film's music, but at the end of the page, there is another section about the film's soundtrack, which appears to be confusing and repetitive. These two sections can be merged into one.

Tone
The page adopts an objective and professional tone without colloquial or biased language.

Citation
Most of the citations are clear and come from reliable sources, but citation appears to be unspecified and missing in some places. For example, in the lead section, the page writes "many of whom placed the film on their top-ten lists for the year," without specifying where the information come from. Following this sentence, the next sentence "It has received criticism and praise from members of both the anti-abortion and abortion rights communities regarding its treatment of abortion" lacks citation as well. Under the music subheading, one quote from guitarist Billy Katz lacks citation, so does the quote of Reitman in the next section.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)