User:Jiayi Yan/Li Wenyi/GustavoCalva Peer Review

General info
Jiayi Yan/ Li Wenyi
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jiayi Yan/Li Wenyi
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

the lead was good and provided with a good overarching content over the focus of the indivudal. It includes a description of the major lead as well.

Content:

The content itself was relevant and up to date. I will say that the only thing is that a lot of the different sections have small subsections which isn't necesarrily bad but I feel like it could be left as their own section or I would create line breaks in between the bigger areas so that it is not as confusing. For example, the Early Activism section could be separated by a line break and then the bolded sections would just be underneath, that way it is clear it's still in the Early Activism box.

Tone and Balance:

The tone and balance is good, it feels imformative rather than opionated and it touches on the life of the individual that I have seen in other articles I've read in the past.

Sources and References:

5 sources and references isn't bad considering the limited sourcing that was probably present; however, there is a lot of information and content in the article so it might appear that those 5 sources are limiting the scope of information. That being said, limited information and other aspects could have been the reason why so I wouldn't dwell too much on obtaining more information.