User:Jiayi Yan/Li Wenyi/KevinSantosKS Peer Review

General info
Jiayi Yan, AmandaGong, Paintedsakura, Chenle1113, Akajpg2023
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Jiayi Yan/Li Wenyi
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes, the introductory sentence does a good job at introducing Li Wenyi by mentioning her birthplace, education, and occupation. However, the syntax of the first sentence is a bit awkward after "born in Wuhan, Hubei."
 * Does the lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes, the lead gives a short summary of Li Wenyi's life and activism in China.


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Yes, the lead is concise and contains just enough details.

Content:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the content added is relevant to this topic. However, the first paragraph under the section titled "Turning Point: Break from YWCA, Move toward CWA," seems to go too in-depth into these organizations.


 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Yes, there is no current, english wikipedia article on Li Wenyi.

Tone and Balance:


 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, the content added appears to be neutral in tone and does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor or against any positions.

Sources and References:


 * Are the sources current?
 * The sources are diverse, with some being from the mid-1900s while others are from the 21st century.


 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * The links work, but maybe some linked can be added for the first, second, third, and fifth sources, if possible.

Organization:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * The content added is well-written and is organized in a very easy-to-read chronological order.

Overall Impressions:


 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The content added is really detailed about Li Wenyi's activism and participation.