User:Jiewlord/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
This is the article I chose. It discusses molecules as a whole and how they are formed, bond types, and their shapes.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because the course that I am taking is a communication course that focuses on Chemistry. Molecules are an important part of chemistry as a discipline, overall. The article goes in depth with the topic and explains the material clearly and with a neutral point of view.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Everything discussed in the article is relevant to Molecule. There is nothing that distracts from the reading. The History section of the article does not make use of heavy quotation to get the point across.

The information on this article is up to date since the last update to this article on Molecule was updated a few days ago. There are some areas where the article has to cite sources from the 1920s, particularly in the History section.

The article does not contain any notable equity gaps. There are no visible biases seen in this article.

There are not a lot of areas in this article that needs to be improved. The article is neutral. This article mainly focuses on a scientific topic with no relevant biases.

There section that discusses molecular size is underrepresented. More information on this section is required.

The links to the citations work and support the information that was claimed in the article.

The references ranges from scientific journals to books. Images used are relevant to the article. There are sources from a diverse array of authors and publications, recent and old.

Looking at the talk page of this article, many users offer suggestions on improving the article. One user noted that the article needed to be discussed in a way that would make sense to 6th and 7th grade students. This article is rated a Class C and is part of WikiProjects for physics and chemistry. Collaborators on this Wikipedia article discuss how some of the material can be simplified.