User:Jiguguji/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Beijing Haidian Foreign Language Shi Yan School

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I graduated from this high school so I think I know it pretty well, so I can compare the information that I know to the information in Wikipedia.

Evaluate the article
Everything in the article is related to the article topic, but the article doesn't have a lead that helps describe the article's topic, maybe because the article is too short to need a proper lead. For content, this article is definately out-dated. Right now we can choose from Lake Shore Schools and Anchor Bay Schools for the exchange project instead of only Lake Shore Schools. And also the article made a mistake on the number of sister school. Furthermore, there's little information in this article, only included the establishing year and two big affairs in 2011 and 2014. For Tone and Balance, the article is faily neutral. All sentences are objective and no bias at all. It introduces this high school without any persuasive saying. For the Sources and References section, all links in the article work and support the claims in the article. The resources are all from Wikipedia as well, which are non-biased, and from a diverse array of authors and publications. For the Organization and writing quality, the article is well-written and well-organized, with clear section and line break, and none of grammar mistakes. For Images and Media, there is only one picture for this school's front door, which fail to provide an intact scene of the whole school environment. For Talk Page discussion, there's no any conversation for this article. For overall impression, the article's stength is on the organization and writing quality and it's neutralness, but it still got a lot of things to improve, especially for the content part. There really should be more information for this school including the environment, application data for foreign college, teachers and so on.